It seems grimly motivating, and also at times it could be: The reviews tend to be saturated in users congratulating one another for sticking with their criteria, thanking one another profusely for elucidating a typical relationship problem or вЂњmale depravityвЂќ and commiserating about their Pickmeisha pasts (вЂњStay strong, sister!вЂќ). Plus some of this core points of FDS look like healthy relationship advice for anybody, like than to be in a shitty relationship just for the sake of it, and that you may as well be upfront about your standards to avoid wasting everyoneвЂ™s time that itвЂ™s better to be single and work on yourself.
But FDS has a darker part, too.
Users are warned, as an example, against coffee dates, any intercourse without dedication, having boyfriends within their 20s and males whom arenвЂ™t in professions they enjoy. вЂњItвЂ™s constantly simpler to cut a person down too early than far too late,вЂќ a Ruthless Strategist warns. вЂњThereвЂ™s no thing that is such applying excessively care in terms of guys.вЂќ The mods additionally tolerate small debate about these strictures, and freely punish dissent by assigning the Pickmeishaв„ў flair to commenters whom disagree using them. вЂњThis sub may be toxic,вЂќ comments one woman whom claims she ended up being labeled a Pickmeishaв„ў for the sin of saying she enjoys casual intercourse. вЂњI often make reference to this sub because the meanest place that is female-only the world-wide-web,вЂќ claims another.
Often FDS also seems cultish, featuring its spiritual observance of strict guidelines, 12-step language, concentrate on the community within the person (вЂњDo it to help make FDS proud!вЂќ) and warnings against interacting with outsiders. (whenever I reached away to the moderators for remark, they didnвЂ™t react to my messages but pinned a notice warning community members to not talk with reporters).